TradePortfolio

World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador | HIP-4 Outcome Market Analytics on Hyperliquid

This page tracks the World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador HIP-4 outcome market on Hyperliquid. Review the market description, possible outcomes, and settlement source before interpreting its trading data.

Over the last 30 days, the World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador HIP-4 outcome market traded $239.82 in notional across 2 trades, with 3 unique traders. Total fees: $0. Latest end-of-day open interest for this market (USD): $122.21K.

Data updated: .

View the full HIP-4 dashboard.

World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador

Summary

FAQs

World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador questions

The dashboard tracks World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador trading activity, open interest, traders, fees, and outcome-token contribution.

  • What does the World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador market represent?

    World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador is a Hyperliquid outcome market tied to a defined event and settlement specification. Read the market description and resolution source before interpreting either outcome.

  • How should the World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador market price be interpreted?

    Price reflects the market's traded valuation of an outcome under the contract rules. It can resemble an implied probability, but fees, liquidity, and settlement mechanics can prevent a one-to-one probability interpretation.

  • How much activity is in World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador?

    Traded notional measures the value exchanged in World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador during the selected period. Trade count and unique traders add context about how broadly that activity is distributed.

  • What does open interest in World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador show?

    Open interest measures outstanding exposure in World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador. It differs from volume because it excludes positions that traded and were subsequently closed.

  • What are the main risks in World Cup: Ivory Coast vs Ecuador?

    Key risks include misreading the resolution rules, thin liquidity, price gaps, changing event information, and uncertainty around the settlement source.